![]() Two boxes of Budweiser steins, but they are different boxes with different colors. One ceramic object is on a white background, while its match is of the same subject matter but a different piece, and the colors are different and it's in front of a basket.Ģ. Some pairs are SIMILAR, but not DUPLICATES.ġ. Some "duplicates" have different backgrounds or are different sizes, some have different extensions. It did find images that are SIMILAR, but didn't filter them as much as I'd expect, and there are no search criteria settings. Now it's at 63% and going very slow, taking about 7 seconds for each 1% progress (just hit 148% CPU). ![]() ![]() It's currently at 60% and using around 130% CPU. I then tried a folder containing many subfolders of images that I use in craigslist ads (866 items) The app went fast up to 49%, then really bogged down at 53%. ![]() Since they're wallpaper, they're large images, and two folders contain images over 3000 x 2000 pixels.īut the description says nothing about size limitations. I just canceled the dupe-hunting process as it was going nowhere fast, but taxing my computer's resources. The app hung for a looong time on 50%, then finally made it to 51%, where it's been for 10 minutes.Īnd my fans have been racing as the app is using well over 100% CPU (highest I saw was 171%). Moved on to a wallpaper folder containing 18 subfolders (5,851 items). Installed and registered with ease and opens up a dreary looking mud coloured interface.For my first test a JPG image was saved with different compression levels it was also resized, all were placed into a single folder.The program rapidly found that they all had the image same and marked them as duplicates.In my second test scanned a small partition that I know has many, many duplicate files and it found them.It displays them as thumbnails in a window but to get information you need to select them individually, this makes removing them a tedious business.From my own programming experience I know it is difficult to find a useful method of organising the results.Certainly in my second test it would have been better if I could have grouped them by the folder names or paths.Using Timeline many of the selection disappeared, a bit of a surprise.In my first test the files were put in the root directory of a partition and when that folder was scanned it quickly found the duplicates.When the same test was done using the folders and subfolders menu selection it did not find the duplicates, a serious bug.When it does a scan using the Similar selection the level of similarity was not possible to set.From a user point of view it is not particularly pleasant to use and the fact that it got different results when the selection was a Folder or Folders And Subfolders when it should have been the same result an obvious bug.It still needs a lot of development and I will not be keeping it.The first folder I selected is full of animated gifs, and this app evidently can't process those. It still needs a lot of development and I will not be keeping it. When it does a scan using the Similar selection the level of similarity was not possible to set.įrom a user point of view it is not particularly pleasant to use and the fact that it got different results when the selection was a Folder or Folders And Subfolders when it should have been the same result an obvious bug. When the same test was done using the folders and subfolders menu selection it did not find the duplicates, a serious bug. In my first test the files were put in the root directory of a partition and when that folder was scanned it quickly found the duplicates. Using Timeline many of the selection disappeared, a bit of a surprise. It displays them as thumbnails in a window but to get information you need to select them individually, this makes removing them a tedious business.įrom my own programming experience I know it is difficult to find a useful method of organising the results.Ĭertainly in my second test it would have been better if I could have grouped them by the folder names or paths. In my second test scanned a small partition that I know has many, many duplicate files and it found them. The program rapidly found that they all had the image same and marked them as duplicates. Installed and registered with ease and opens up a dreary looking mud coloured interface.įor my first test a JPG image was saved with different compression levels it was also resized, all were placed into a single folder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |